spacer.gif header.jpg
nav_federal_tort_off.gif nav_military_claims_off.gif nav_track_record_on.gif nav_legal_consultation_off.gif nav_a_service_of_off.gif
drop_shadow.gif
subpic_04.jpg
Find out more about our attorneys
Cases we handle
eleven_questions.gif
spacer.gif
contact_us.gif
spacer.gif spacer.gif
Forty years of success, leadership and experience

Our attorneys have won precedent-setting victories in court and in administrative claims against a number of federal agencies. Here is a sample of some of our results in Federal Tort Claims Act cases. Prospective clients should bear in mind that every case is different, and no lawyer can promise a specific result. What we CAN promise is that we bring to every client and every case our commitment to devote our full legal and financial resources to win justice for that client's cause.



Calva Cerqueira v. United States - In 2003, Judge Ricardo M. Urbina, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, awarded negligence victim Enrique Calva Cerqueira the sum of $20 million in damages, believed to be the largest Federal Tort Claims Act judgment for an individual plaintiff in the Washington DC Metropolitan Area. (This was not a case against a military facility, but involved many of the same legal issues since it was against a federal government agency.)

Lewis v. United States - Settlement of $3 million in a case on behalf of a brain-damaged child and his mother against Walter Reed Army Hospital. In this case, Stein Mitchell partner Patrick Malone was hired to represent a brain-damaged child and his mother after the child's claims had already been thrown out by the federal judge on statute of limitations grounds. Mr. Malone persuaded the judge to reverse himself. The government then settled the boy's claims for $3 million, which fully funded a plan for his lifetime care. The decision is reported at 290 F.Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2003).

Muenstermann v. United States - Judgment of $5.5 million entered in nonjury malpractice case in federal court in Baltimore, Maryland involving moderate to serious birth injuries sustained due to medical negligence at the time of delivery at Malcolm Grow Medical Center at Andrews Air Force Base. The case is reported at 787 F. Supp. 499 (D. Md. 1992).

Ellis v. United States - A $3.5 million settlement with the federal government on behalf of a baby who suffered neurological injuries at birth at the hospital at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland.

Legal Consultation 

If you or a family member has suffered a serious, permanent injury related to a government or military physician's malpractice or negligence, you may want to talk to a lawyer. We provide free consultations to help determine if you have a valid medical negligence case.

Our firm is based in Washington, D.C. and can handle injury claims against the United States government anywhere. The final decision makers in the government often are based in or near Washington - in the U.S. Justice Department or one of the military branches.

We will need to obtain complete medical records to do a good analysis. Contact us with this form to provide basic information to get the process started:

Name of injured person:
 
Your name (if different):
Address:
City: State: Zip code:
Telephone:
 
E-mail address:
 

When was the injury first diagnosed?

Name and/or address of government facility involved:

Please describe your injury or injuries:
   
Stein, Mitchell & Mezines respects your privacy and the information you send us is strictly confidential.  We use this contact form solely to make a preliminary decision about  whether you might have a claim and whether we might be able to help you. The use of the Internet, and this form, to communicate with Stein, Mitchell & Mezines LLP does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

           - indicates required field  

 

spacer.gif
spacer.gif

 

copyright, Stein, Mitchell & Mezines LLP :: 1100 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036
phone: 202.737.7777 fax: 202.296.8312
spacer.gif

spacer.gif